A History of Biculturalism in NZAP up to 2007

This is a short history of the Bicultural Journey within NZAP up to 2007. It will be updated.

A History of Biculturalism in NZAP up to 2007

In the process of researching this history, Rhona Carson discovered that there was a notice of motion at the 1994 AGM:

That the following be adopted at the 1995 AGM ‘That the Constitution be amended to include in the objects the clause: “to ensure that psychotherapy in Aotearoa New Zealand is conducted in accordance with the articles contained in the Treaty of Waitangi”.’ moved Merv Hancock, seconded Charles Waldegrave.

At the 1995 AGM Jonathan Fay proposed an amendment, Peter Mcgeorge seconded, so that the motion now read
‘That the Constitution be amended to include in the objects the following clause: “to explore ways in which psychotherapy may be guided by the articles and spirit of the Treaty of Waitangi”.’

This was passed unanimously, but has never been enacted. It seems to have been an oversight, and at the time of writing Rhona is investigating whether this action can now be taken.

In 1994, Haare Williams, a generous Tuhoe kaumatua, was first approached to help with the development of biculturalism in the Association, and has worked with NZAP in various ways since then. In March 1997 President Peter Reid announced that Haare had agreed to serve as Pae Arahi, (a‘bridge’) for the Association, and to form a Runanga to provide the necessary support and assistance in developing a bicultural vision and strategic plan.

Progress was slow. In 1998 the Nelson branch proposed that a member of Council be delegated as responsible for bicultural developments. It was agreed that bicultural issues would become a standing item on the Council agendas and at the AGM. The September newsletter carried an article by Haare Williams on ‘NZAP – The Bicultural Journey’.

In 2000, Faye Gorman (Dunedin) called for representatives from each region to meet and address bicultural aspects, asking how NZAP manifests treaty obligations. A ‘bicultural working party’ was formed, meeting for the first time at the 2001 Wellington conference with Sheila Larsen as chairperson. Sheila drew attention to the practice of the Maori name of the association being in smaller type than the English name, and it was agreed to correct this. The working party set up its own e-mail contact list and debated the issues among themselves. Each newsletter during the year had an article relevant to understanding bicultural/treaty issues.

At the Nelson Nelson, the Bicultural Committee, as it was now known, made itself visible to the membership by having a ‘fishbowl’ meeting at a plenary session, discussing the issues among themselves before inviting dialogue with the wider group. Sheila Larsen reported to Council that it was “clear that these issues arouse passions and feelings that are painful, and that we have to find a balance between working carefully, sensitively and sometimes slowly with those, while not going so slowly that no progress is made.”

In June 2002 the committee held a hui at Te Poho o Tangiianui marae in Hawkes Bay, organised by Fay Danvers at which its purpose became clearly defined around the Treaty of Waitangi. This hui was supported by Anihana Daly, a long time friend of Fay and the leading light behind Awhina Whanau Services, the kaupapa Maori provider who would be a partner in organising the 2007 Napier conference. Also present was Mitzi Nairn, known for her knowledge of the Treaty. Fay was intent upon leading the karanga at the following year’s conference, but that was not to be. She was already gravely ill and would die less than a year later.

In 2003 Sean Manning, newly elected to Council, took over the Bicultural Committee Chair from Sheila Larsen. The Committee met at the Te Kai Waha Marae in the Hokianga in August, and three guiding principles emerged from this hui:

  • The Treaty was the central focus of the committee’s work.
  • The committee was concerned to nurture and establish real relationships
    with Maori.
  • It was the responsibility of each individual, group and committee within NZAP to become educated on cross-cultural and Treaty matters, and form their own partnerships and relationships with Maori. It was felt that change would occur through the Branches by forming relationships at a local level.

The Treaty first appeared in the new Code of Ethics which was adopted in 2002. In 2003 the bicultural committee put forward a recommendation that their name be changed to ‘The NZAP Advisory Committee on Te Tiriti’. The Maori term ‘Te Tiriti’ was deliberately used, indicating that the Maori language version was regarded as the authentic document.

The proposal was left on the table pending further discussions among the wider membership. After being discussed at the members’ forum in 2004 the name ‘NZAP Advisory Committee on Te Tiriti and Bicultural Issues’ was adopted, thus further formalising a commitment to the Treaty. The term ‘bicultural’ was kept because of a widespread feeling that it expressed the way we wanted to be.

By this time it was clear that the quality of the real, already existing relationship between NZAP branches and committees, and local Maori, is fundamentally important in determining the relative success of activities carried out in partnership.

In November 2006 the ‘Treat Committee’ organised a hui at Whaiora Marae in Otara, inviting Maori who might be interested in an association with, or membership of, NZAP. There were a number of by familiar names. Among the Maori present, Ripeka August, Anihana Daly, Haare Williams, Margaret Poutu Morice, Cherry Wilson, Faye Gorman, Mihiteria King, Barbara Niania, Iona Winters and Matewawe Pouwhare wrote about the experience in the December newsletter. The hui was also attended by members of the Treaty committee, Council and the Admissions Committee. At the hui, the possibility of a ‘Brown Book’ – a Maori version of the well-known ‘Orange Book’ – the NZAP admissions policy and procedures – was planned, but at the time of writing, has not emerged. What did emerge was a ‘Maori caucus’, called Waka Oranga, that was presented to Council by Cherry Wilson and Haare Williams the following year as the ‘runanga’ envisaged by Haare 10 years previously. The document they brought was published in the August 2007 newsletter.

The Treaty Committee began working with conference organisers in advance of the 2007 Napier conference and now establishes a relationship with each conference committee to support the local links with Mana Whenua.

Eileen Birch took over as chairperson of Te Tiriti and Bicultural committee in (2006) and she was followed by John O’Connor. At the Nelson conference the committee decided on bicultural leadership by Grant Dillon (Tauiwi) and Barbara NiaNia (Waka Oranga).

Acknowledgment: the above is an edited version of the history of bicultural relationships within NZAP taken from the History of NZAP written by Sean Manning.

The Memoradum of Understanding between Te Tiriti and Bicultural committee and NZAP council follows:
Memorandum of Understanding between NZAP Council and the National Advisory Committee on Te Tiriti and Bicultural Issues

Purposes and Roles of the Committee

  1. To provide advice and guidance to council and the association on issues regarding biculturalism and the implications and responsibilities of the Treaty of Waitangi, for members and the association.
  2. To provide guidance and support to NZAP conference organising committees on how they will address the relationship with Tangata Whenua, and Treaty obligations generally, in organising the annual NZAP conference.
  3. To assist and support national and local branch bicultural initiatives (including distribution of funding, the budget for which is provided to the committee by council).
  4. To enhance the participation of Maori in the association, and access for Maori to the resources of the association.
  5. To provide liaison and support to Maori within NZAP.
  6. To provide guidance on all NZAP documentation in relation to biculturalism and the obligations of the Treaty of Waitangi
  7. The committee will report on its work to the Council and the AGM

Membership

Membership decisions are made by the committee and ratified by Council. The following principles are to be observed, though they may be varied for reasons such as willingness, ability, experience, availability and financial resources (the existing committee members would then select from those nominated based in part on ensuring a good geographical spread):

  1. Membership of the committee should comprise a maximum of 10 members
  2. The committee should represent the regions.
  3. Committee members should be supported by their regional branches
  4. The gender and cultural background of members will also be considered with the aim of maintaining a good balance within the membership of the committee.

Convenor

The Convenor will be appointed by council and will be one of the elected members of council.